Threaded Mode | Linear Mode

Waldo · 01-20-2015 04:02 PM

(01-20-2015 03:27 PM)CB4ME Wrote: Love those HP numbers!

One of these days I'm going to take my bike up to Don. I have Motogear headers, Staintune and TSR air funnel.

I'd like to see the difference with the headers. Make sure you post when you get the chance.

Rboe · 01-20-2015 08:26 PM

I went with a Griso........ Excited

CBhooligan · 01-19-2018 06:55 PM

(01-20-2015 06:41 AM)Waldo Wrote: I just had my bike Dyno'd today. I have a TSR air funnel K&N air filter and a custom slip on exhaust from cone engineering. I had the mods on before the tune. The baseline was 86.39 hp and 68.22 torque and I ended up with 91.19 hp and 71.40 torque. I'm pretty happy with the results. I plan on getting my bike reflas he'd in the future to remove all the de tunes just to have a little more response and a little more on the top end doesn't hurt. My question is would another dyno be worth it after a reflash or will the reflash just improve upon my previous dyno?

I like cone engineer reverse cones, how do you like it?

**Cormanus** · 01-19-2018 08:16 PM

CBhooligan, no sign of Waldo since July 2015.

PowerDubs · 01-19-2018 09:34 PM

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

CBhooligan · 01-19-2018 09:53 PM

(01-19-2018 08:16 PM)Cormanus Wrote: CBhooligan, no sign of Waldo since July 2015.

ahhhhh ok, thanks I see. Learning Learning ****

**Cormanus** · 01-19-2018 10:11 PM

CBhooligan, no worries, but, in reality, who would know whether he looks at the forum without logging in, so it may always be worth asking the question if you really want to know.

By the way, can anyone tell me why Wally had to be renamed Waldo for the North American market?

peterbaron · 01-20-2018 05:00 PM

(01-20-2015 06:41 AM)Waldo Wrote: I had the mods on before the tune. The baseline was 86.39 hp and 68.22 torque and I ended up with 91.19 hp and 71.40 torque. I'm pretty happy with the results.

Not to offend you Hello

theoretically.. 4.8 HP & 3.18 torque more = ROFL

= sorry, but for me not worth digging (compared to baseline). How much did you spend on mods?
I'd like to see results BEFORE mods, for further assessment please.
Beer

pb

Ulvetanna · 01-20-2018 08:33 PM

(01-20-2018 05:00 PM)peterbaron Wrote:
(01-20-2015 06:41 AM)Waldo Wrote: I had the mods on before the tune. The baseline was 86.39 hp and 68.22 torque and I ended up with 91.19 hp and 71.40 torque. I'm pretty happy with the results.

Not to offend you
theoretically.. 4.8 HP & 3.18 torque more = = sorry, but for me not worth digging (compared to baseline). How much did you spend on mods?
I'd like to see results BEFORE mods, for further assessment please.

pb

The benefit is in cleaning up throttle response, reducing driveline lash (fuel cut eliminated) and popping, more efficiency, and generally improving the rideability of the bike. A little bit more power but an improved power band can really help the feel of the bike.

That said, I never did get around to sending my ECU to Don Guhl because the 2013, mine anyway, ran very well.

I would not want to think I'd have to reflash a 2017 to cure any problems. I hope they've gotten that sorted out with the Euro 4 and so on.

How about an image of the dyno run to see the entire powerband?

TINK · 01-20-2018 10:09 PM

I'm sorry to be the party pooper here; but I really don't understand the point of putting buckets of money into mods to increase the HP from 86 to 91 (6%) on a bike like the CB1100.
You want HP, there are plenty of other bikes out there that are smoking hot right out of the box; e.g. Kawi ZR900RS has 111 HP, stock, and it's a "retro" bike too.
It's your nickel, and you can spend it as you see fit, but my mod dollars were spent on suspension, not HP, thank you very much.